Author |
Topic: Midi Yoke and Logic not working ? (Read 29231 times) |
|
tron_74
New Member
MIDI-OX Rules!
Posts: 2
|
 |
Re: Midi Yoke and Logic not working ?
« Reply #40 on: Aug 10th, 2004, 5:45pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
Hello you all,
first my spefications of system:
I have running W2ooo SP 3 under PIII with 400 Mhz,
256 MB RAM and an ESS Meastro Soundcard (Standard under Dell Machines).
As Sequenzer is running Pro Logic 5.5.0. and Rebirt 2.02 for Acidlines and Baseconstruction.
After installation I had some trobles with Pro Logic same as many people described. When started I recieved a Window what told me "Midi Feedback Detected, Port 1# Disabled".
I tried tschaga`s Version od editing Win.Ini and now it works, jesus cries, It`s still working.
But who will use this Tip, please RECOGNIZE;URGENT!!!!
Don`t rename your copy of win.ini to win.bak because .bak sometimes becomes overwriting by some text and system editors like Ultra-Edit or code-programming Interfaces.
Name it Win.original
this a name of fantasy and no editior will overwrite it because no software is working with.And in the list of WinNT you find it directly at win.ini, so you whoever you made a mistake can reset your Win.Ini
[Logic]
MidiIn_Ess_Maestro_PCI=1
MidiOut_Ess_Maestro_PCI=7
MidiOut_Microsoft_GS_Wavetable_SW_Synth=7
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___1=0
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___2=0
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___3=0
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___4=0
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___5=1
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___6=1
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___7=1
MidiIn_MIDI_Yoke_NT___8=1
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___1=7
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___2=7
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___3=7
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___4=7
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___5=0
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___6=0
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___7=0
MidiOut_MIDI_Yoke_NT___8=0
In time I try to enlarge my knowledge how to initiate Rebirth by ReWire in Logic. If somebody knows how,
please explain.
I found one useful manual in PDF Format which explains mainly Parts of Logic. Is it possible to load it up at this Side so that others have a good use to it ?
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
maiki
Member
MIDI-OX Rules!
Posts: 25
|
|
Re: Midi Yoke and Logic not working ?
« Reply #41 on: Feb 12th, 2005, 6:35pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Sep 27th, 2001, 1:04pm, stonecut wrote:| There are no competitive virtual midi cables out for Windows XP except for Midi Yoke so investing time here would surely be beneficial to you. |
|
Not true, actually. There are a couple of other virtual midi cables that work in Windows XP. One is the Maple Virtual MIDI cable
http://www.marblesound.com/Maple_driver.html.
Another one is: LoopBe1: http://www.nerds.de/en/loopbe1.html.
I don't know if either of these have less latency than MIDIYOKE NT. If anyone here compares that factor in these different VMCs, it would be interesting to see the result.
I did try these others to see if I would have the same problem I had (described in another thread) of playing a plug-in softsynth track in Sonar using a virtual keyboard program through MIDIYOKE. I had the same problem with both of these other VMCs as well. But I don't know how they compare in other factors, such as latency, resources used, stability, etc. If anyone has compared various factors in the VMCs, it would be interesting to see the results.
As far as the second part of your sentence, that investing time in rewriting Midiyoke NT would be beneficial to Jamie, I'm not sure about that. It could certainly be beneficial to people who use virtual midi cables in XP, 2000, etc., if that program were improved. As a free program, for which he receives no compensation, I'm not sure how it would be beneficial to Jamie, other than the personal satisfaction involved in having improved a program, etc. I agree that it's great that he spends time on this board answering questions! 
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
dewdman42
New Member
MIDI-OX Rules!
Posts: 8
|
|
Re: Midi Yoke and Logic not working ?
« Reply #42 on: Jun 8th, 2006, 5:56pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Does anyone know if anyone has done a benchmark to compare latency and throughput, cpu use, etc.. comparisons between MidiYoke and those other kernel mode virtual midi port drivers? They claim to have lower latency by virtue of the fact that they are in the kernel, but since it still comes down to two user mode apps being connected...I'm not sure how a kernal mode driver would make any difference at all.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
User Forum ::
Powered by YaBB
Home 
Help 
Search 
Members 
Login 
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print